Legal Opinion

In Re DirecTV Early Cancellation Litigation

District Court, C.D. California

Decided September 7, 2010No. Case ML 09-2093 AG (ANx)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DIRECTV’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION WITH CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS AND DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ CLAIMS

ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.

In this Multidistrict Litigation (“MDL”) case concerning early cancellation fees, Defendant DirecTV filed a Motion to Dismiss Claims in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint and to Compel Arbitration with the Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, New York, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, and Virginia Plaintiffs (“Motion”). After considering all papers and arguments submitted, the Motion is GRANTED in…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re iPhone Application Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  2. Low v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  3. In re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  4. Fraley v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
  5. Premier Payments Online, Inc. v. Payment Systems WorldwideDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API