Legal Opinion

In Re Holland

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1941No. 26153. Rule dischargedPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stone

This cause is here on the report of the commissioners of the Chicago Bar Association, authorized by rule No. 59 of this court to investigate the conduct of attorneys, recommending that the license of the respondent to practice law be suspended for a period of two years. Respondent has filed exceptions to that report and briefs have been filed and arguments made.

Respondent, at the time of the hearing, was a judge of the municipal court of the city of Chicago, having been first elected to that office in 1932. It appears that during November, 1939, the grand jury of Cook county was engaged in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Twining v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. People Ex Rel. Taylor v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Matter of DoyleNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Christal v. Police CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Scholl v. BellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. In Re HeirichIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Laba v. Newark Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  4. In Re WittIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Faxon v. School Committee of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API