Legal Opinion

In Re Heirich

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1956No. 33455PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a proceeding to strike respondent Heirich’s name from the roll of attorneys pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 59. On June 29, 1950, a formal complaint was filed by the committee on personal injury practice of the Chicago Bar Association, signed by its chairman, charging in substance, that respondent had been guilty of conduct and practices tending to bring the legal profession into disrepute, and had solicited professional employment directly and by employed runners and touters, and had divided fees for legal services with persons not admitted to the practice of law. The complaint also…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. In re DayIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Smith v. Department of Registration & EducationIllinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. Florida Bar v. MurrellSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. In Re Information to Discipline Certain Attorneys of SanitaryIllinois Supreme Court · 1932

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul, & Pacific Railroad v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Mank v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. In Re KrasnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  4. United States Wrestling Federation v. The Wrestling Division of the Aau, Inc., and Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  5. Board of Education of Community Consolidated High School District No. 230 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API