City of McAlester v. Delciello
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice.
Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the “City”, has appealed from a judgment for defendants for damages to real property, resulting from the taking of a part of defendants’ property by condemnation.
The City is a municipal corporation authorized to condemn and take private property for public purposes. On July 8, 1963, the City passed and adopted a resolution declaring that public necessity required condemnation of a fee simple title and abut-ter’s right of access to the property, described by metes and bounds, owned by defendants. The property sought to be condemned was to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Champlin Refining Co. v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Samara v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Wilkerson v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Root v. KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- McInturff v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. BurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
- City of Stilwell v. Ozarks Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Corbell v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.