Legal Opinion

City of McAlester v. Delciello

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 29, 1966No. 41207PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BERRY, Justice.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the “City”, has appealed from a judgment for defendants for damages to real property, resulting from the taking of a part of defendants’ property by condemnation.

The City is a municipal corporation authorized to condemn and take private property for public purposes. On July 8, 1963, the City passed and adopted a resolution declaring that public necessity required condemnation of a fee simple title and abut-ter’s right of access to the property, described by metes and bounds, owned by defendants. The property sought to be condemned was to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Finley v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
  2. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DanielSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Champlin Refining Co. v. DonnellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Samara v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  5. Wilkerson v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Root v. KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  2. McInturff v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Transmission Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. BurkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1966
  4. City of Stilwell v. Ozarks Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. Corbell v. State Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API