State Bank of Lehi v. Woolsey
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Before us is a judgment allowing foreclosure. Plaintiff held, and the action was grounded on, a security interest in realty, and personalty pledged by defendants. We affirm. Costs to plaintiffs.
Defendants operated a mink ranch and became indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $161,000. The debt was evidenced by three promissory notes, and certain security agreements.
On January 2, 1976, plaintiff filed this action, in keeping with an appropriate acceleration clause. It alleged the three notes were delinquent and sought foreclosure of its security interest, in both the real and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- FARMERS CO-OP. EL., INC., DUNCOMBE v. State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- Young v. VailNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
- Bullfrog Marina, Inc. v. LentzUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Arizona Coffee Shops, Inc. v. Phoenix Downtown Parking Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Murphy v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Dugan v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- Ron Case Roofing & Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. BlomquistUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Jill P. Mitchell Living TrustDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Union Bank v. SwensonUtah Supreme Court · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.