Legal Opinion

Camden County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Beretta

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 16, 2001No. 01-1051PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

273 F.3d 536 (3rd Cir. 2001)

CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, APPELLANT,

v.

*BERETTA, U.S.A. CORP.; PIETRO BERETTA; BROWNING ARMS CO.; BRYCO ARMS, INC.; COLT'S MFG CO., INC.; DAVIS INDUSTRIES, INC.; GLOCK, INC.; HI-POINT FIREARMS; H&R 1871 INC.; CARL WALTHER GMBH; LORCIN ENGINEERING CO., INC.; NAVEGAR, INC.; PHOENIX ARMS; RAVEN ARMS, INC.; SMITH & WESSON CORP.; STURM, RUGER

AND CO., INC.; FORJAS TAURUS, S.A.; REPUBLIC ARMS; JOHN DOE MANUFACTURERS (1-100); JOHN DOE DEALERS (1-100); JOHN DOE DISTRIBUTORS (1-100)

No. 01-1051

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Argued:…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hamilton v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  4. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey v. Arcadian Corp Dyno Nobel Inc, F/k/a, Ireco Incorporated Hydro Agri North America, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  5. Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Ashley County, Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  2. City of Chicago v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A., Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. In Re Lead Paint LitigationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
  5. City of Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API