Legal Opinion
Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Kelley
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 30, 2005No. A04-2376PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. Barry, Justice.
This case comes to us as a certified question from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, which asks us to determine whether the definitions of “political committee” and “political fund” in Minn.Stat. § 10A.01, subds. 27 and 28 .should be construed consistent with Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1, 96 S.Ct. 612, 46 L.Ed.2d 659 (1976). An unsuccessful candidate for the Minnesota Senate, David Racer, and two issue advocacy organizations, Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. (MCCL) and the Committee for State Pro-Life Candidates, contended in federal district…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McConnell v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Virginia Society for Human Life, Inc. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1998
- Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- City of Duluth v. SaretteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Lyon Financial Services, Incorporated, d/b/a U.S. Bancorp Business Equipment Finance Group v. Illinois Paper and Copier CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Iowa Right To Life Committee v. Megan TookerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Brent R. Wilcox v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Defendant/Respondent.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. SwansonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.