Legal Opinion

Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. Swanson

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 20, 2010No. Civil 10-2938 (DWF/JSM)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DONOVAN W. FRANK, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

The Supreme Court of the United States recently ruled that the government may not prohibit corporations from making independent expenditures for political speech that expressly advocates for or against the election of candidates for political office. Citizens United v. Fed. Election Comm’n, — U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 876, 882, 175 L.Ed.2d 753 (2010). In response to that ruling, the Minnesota legislature amended Minnesota law, which formerly prohibited corporations from making independent expenditures, to expressly allow for…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. DanielczykDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
  3. Yamada v. WeaverDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
  4. Iowa Right to Life Committee, Inc. v. SmithsonDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2010
  5. Chula Vista Citizens for Jobs & Fair Competition v. NorrisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API