City of Duluth v. Sarette
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ROGOSHESKE, Justice.
Defendants were charged with six separate violations of Duluth City Code, § 34-12, which makes it unlawful for any person “ * * * knowingly to exhibit, sell, print, offer to sell, give away, circulate, publish * * * any obscene book, magazine, * * * motion picture film, * * * or other arti cle which is obscene.” 1 After summary trials to the county court, they were found guilty and fined $300 per violation. 2 Defendants appealed to a three-judge panel of the district court, challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance, denial of a jury trial, and the impartiality of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Leech v. American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
- Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. LibertaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- M.S. News Co. v. CasadoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
- State v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
- Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.