Legal Opinion

City of Duluth v. Sarette

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 31, 1979No. 48920PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

Defendants were charged with six separate violations of Duluth City Code, § 34-12, which makes it unlawful for any person “ * * * knowingly to exhibit, sell, print, offer to sell, give away, circulate, publish * * * any obscene book, magazine, * * * motion picture film, * * * or other arti cle which is obscene.” 1 After summary trials to the county court, they were found guilty and fined $300 per violation. 2 Defendants appealed to a three-judge panel of the district court, challenging the constitutionality of the ordinance, denial of a jury trial, and the impartiality of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Leech v. American Booksellers Ass'n, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Anderson v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. LibertaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People Ex Rel. Tooley v. Seven Thirty-Five East Colfax, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. M.S. News Co. v. CasadoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1983
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1983
  5. Minnesota Citizens Concerned for Life, Inc. v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API