Legal Opinion

Summers v. Ralston Purina Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 14, 1954No. 6 Div. 172PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Chief Justice.

The appeal is by the plaintiff in the court below from an order and judgment of the court granting defendant’s motion for a new trial and setting aside a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The action was brought by W. D. Summers against the Ralston Purina Company, a corporation, for the recovery of money allegedly due Summers by virtue of an alleged agreement between the two parties. The jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff and judgment was rendered thereon in the sum of $2,164.85, plus interest of $454.60, making a total of $2,-619.45.

The only question…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Stonega Coal & Coke Co. v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906
  2. Alabama Mills, Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  3. Howard v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga. RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  4. Curtiss Candy Co. v. SilbermanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  5. Coffin v. LandisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1864

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bermingham v. Sony Corp. of America, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  2. Estes v. MonkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  3. Northrop v. KirbyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1978
  4. Task Consultants, Inc. v. FinertyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  5. First Nat. Bank of Birmingham v. ChichesterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API