Legal Opinion

Stonega Coal & Coke Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 22, 1906PublishedCited by 64 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of Wise county in an action of assumpsit. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

This is an action of assumpsit, based upon a contract between the Virginia Coal and Iron Company (of which the plaintiff, the Stonega Coke and Coal Company, is the assignee) and the defendant, the Louisville and. Nashville Eailroad Company.

The case made by the last amended declaration, briefly stated, is that the Virginia Coal and Iron Company was the owner of very large and valuable coal mining lands in Wise county, which extended from Big Stone Gap to Norton, a distance of about twelve miles; that the Louisville and Nashville Eailroad Company had extended its line of road through the said…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Willcox & Gibbs Sewing MacHine Co. v. EwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Jones v. Newport News & M. V. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. Marble v. Standard Oil Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Irish v. DeanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Christensen v. Pacific Coast Borax Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Bowman v. State Bank of KeysvilleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  2. Miller v. Sevamp, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1987
  3. Lawrence Chrysler Plymouth Corp. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  4. Doss v. Jamco, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1997
  5. City of Virginia Beach v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 2000

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API