Legal Opinion
Curtiss Candy Co. v. Silberman
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 11, 1930No. 5425PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs below, here appellees, brought their action originally in the chancery court of Hamilton county, Tenn., seeking discovery, accounting, and damages for breach of an alleged contract of exclusive representation of the defendant, in said county, in the sale of its candy products, the best known being a candy bar sold under the name of “Baby Ruth.” The cause was removed to the District Court on the ground of diversity of citizenship and was there tried as an action in equity. While the remedy was properly at law, by a suit for breach of contract, no…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Willard, Sutherland & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- International Shoe Co. v. HerndonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Carlson v. Stone-Ordean-Wells Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1910
- American Merchant Marine Ins. v. LettonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Care Travel Company, Ltd. v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Ford Motor Co. v. Kirkmyer Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Bach v. Friden Calculating MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Jack's Cookie Company, and Cross-Appellee v. A. A. Brooks, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1955
- General Paint Corporation v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.