Legal Opinion · Dissent

Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1999No. Nos. 98-46 and 98-94Published

1DissentPfeifer, J.

“[A]n entity may be characterized as a public utility if the nature of its operation is a matter of public concern.” Marano v. Gibbs (1989), 45 Ohio St.3d 310, 311, 544 N.E.2d 635, 637. To determine whether the nature of an entity’s operation is a matter of public concern, the majority states that three principal factors must be considered: “lack of competition in the local marketplace, the good or service provided, and the existence of regulation by government authority.” See A & B Refuse Disposers, Inc. v. Ravenna Twp. Bd. of Trustees (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 385, 388, 596 N.E.2d 423, 426. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marano v. GibbsOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. A & B Refuse Disposers, Inc. v. Board of Ravenna Township TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. In Re Procedure & Format for Filing Tariffs Under the Michigan Telecommunications ActMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. State Public Service Commission v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API