Legal Opinion
City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 14, 1997No. 1926 C.D. 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
The City of Philadelphia (City) appeals an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) granting a request for a declaratory order by Bell Atlantic-Pennsylvania, Inc. (Bell Atlantic) and directing Bell Atlantic to provide its Master Street Address Guide used in Enhanced 911 (E-911) service to PECO Hyperion Telecommunications (PECO) without its consent.
This case involves the interplay between the Pennsylvania Public Safety Emergency Telephone Act1 (commonly referred to as Act 78) providing guidelines for implementing and maintaining 911 emergency service, Chapter…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Monroeville BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
3Cited by7 opinions
- County of Erie v. Verizon North, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Ramsey Emergency Services, Inc. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
- Pennsylvania State University v. Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Harrisburg Taxicab & Baggage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Campanelli v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.