Dyer v. Leach
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
Action of ejectment to recover a certain tract of land. Judgment went for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
George Leach, being the owner of the land in question, executed a deed of trust of the same to E. Conway, trustee. The object of the trust was to secure a promissory note for $3,358, made by Leach to the Riverside Banking Company, as wrell as certain other moneys. It was provided in the deed that if the money should not be paid when due, the trustee should sell the land, after notice, and in the manner provided therein, and execute a deed to the purchaser. It also provides that there…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hawley v. RossNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- Milbank v. CraneNew York Supreme Court · 1863
- Hoard v. . GarnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Blake v. O'NealWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
- Kurtz v. ForquerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Freeman v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- Bacon v. GrosseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.