Legal Opinion
Weill v. Lieberman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 29, 1985No. 12450PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The only question on this appeal is whether General Statutes § 45-264 permits a fiduciary who has not factually alleged aggrievement to appeal to the Superior Court from his removal for cause by a Probate Court. Upon the application of the attorney *124general of the state of Connecticut, the Probate Court for the district of Norwalk had removed Joseph Weill and Kalman I. Nulman, the duly appointed co-executors of the will of Daphne Seybolt Culpeper, when the co-executors were unable to agree on the formation of a charitable foundation that was the sole beneficiary of the Culpeper estate. Both…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Baskin's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Hartford Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. GazdaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Avery, Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Merrimac Associates, Inc. v. DiSesaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Zoning Board of Appeals v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Buchholz's Appeal from ProbateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Fleet National Bank's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Massini v. Massini, No. 60723 (Jun. 4, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Rizzo v. Estate of Magnano, No. 67079 (Nov. 24, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993