Legal Opinion

Massini v. Massini, No. 60723 (Jun. 4, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 4, 1992No. 60723Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ISSUE

Whether the court should grant the defendant's motion to strike because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this action.

FACTS

The following facts are alleged in the plaintiffs' Reasons of Appeal, #108. The plaintiffs, Joseph E. Massini and Reba E. Miner, allege that they are aggrieved by the order and decree of the Probate Court for the District of Old Saybrook appointing the defendant, Anita Massini, executrix of the estate of the decedent Joseph Massini. The Plaintiffs are the adult children of the decedent and the decedent's late first wife and are beneficiaries under the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Castro v. VieraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. Baskin's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  4. O'LEARY v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Hartford Kosher Caterers, Inc. v. GazdaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API