Clark v. Corser
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtI-Iallam, J.
On November 1, 1921, defendants Cochran and Merrill were doing business as the La Fayette-St. Paul Company. Plaintiff was in *509their employ as automobile salesman. On that day Cochran, acting for the company, gave to plaintiff an instrument purporting to be a bill of sale of a La Fayette touring ear for the sum of $4,000, which the instrument recited had been paid in full. In fact plaintiff had paid only $2,000, and the bill of sale was given to facilitate a sale of the car by him to a prospective purchaser. As part of the transaction, the car was delivered to plantiff. The prospective sale was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Joyce v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Kellogg v. TompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Moors v. WymanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Hickok v. . CowperthwaitNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- State ex rel. City of Duluth v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morley Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Live Stock State Bank v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Holmes v. AndersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Dusenbery v. HawksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Goembel v. HeeschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942