State ex rel. City of Duluth v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by relator from a portion of a judgment of the district court for St. Louis county, entered pursuant to the .findings and order of Cant, J.
1Opinion of the Court
On October 26, 1906, the following opinion was filed:
START, C. J.
Motion to dismiss the relator’s appeal on the grounds (1) that this court has now no jurisdiction of the judgment from a part of which the appeal was taken; (2) that the relator has waived its right to prosecute such appeal. The nature of the action and its facts appear in the opinion of the court in disposing of a former appeal by defendant *281from the same judgment. State v. Northern Pacific Ry. Co., 98 Minn. 429, 108 N. W. 269.
It is only necessary to here state that the action was brought to compel the defendant to repair a…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Guarantee Co. of North America v. Phenix Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Page v. People ex rel. WeberIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
- Corning v. the Troy Iron and Nail FactorySupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- State ex rel. City of Duluth v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Kells v. Nelson-Tenney Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Spurck v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- Jones v. Eastern Michigan MotorbusesMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Lading v. City of DuluthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- City of Chicago v. Pittsburgh, Ft. Wayne & Chicago Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. Village of Clara City v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.