Legal Opinion

Moors v. Wyman

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 9, 1888PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

This is a bill in equity brought by a creditor of the Boston firm of F. Shaw & Brothers, consisting of Fayette Shaw and Brackley Shaw, against that firm ; against another firm in Vanceboro, Maine, of the same name, consisting of the above-named Shaws and Thaxter Shaw; and against Ferdinand A. Wyman, to whom both firms have made voluntary assignments for the benefit of creditors. As the objections to the jurisdiction are now waived, and as the assets in controversy have been converted into money, and a large part of the plaintiff’s claim has been paid since the filing of the bill, leaving only…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Forbes v. Boston and Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  2. Hallgarten v. OldhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  3. Moors v. . KidderNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  4. Kellogg v. TompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  5. Thacher v. MoorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Nowel v. Equitable Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  2. New Haven Wire Co. CasesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  3. Handy v. C. I. T. Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Moors v. ReadingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  5. Beiser v. Western German BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API