FCR Greensboro, Inc. v. C & M Investments of High Point, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Chief Judge.
Defendant contends that the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to vacate or modify the arbitration award, and in confirming the award and entering judgment thereon because the arbitrator exceeded his authority by: (1) awarding liquidated damages not within the scope of the parties’ agreement to arbitrate, and (2) awarding monies for changes in the sprinkler system, a controversy not within the scope of the parties’ agreement to arbitrate. We agree.
The parties’ arbitration agreement is governed by the Uniform Arbitration Act, N.C. Gen. Stat. § 1-567.1, el seq.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cyclone Roofing Co. v. David M. LaFave Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- Rodgers Builders, Inc. v. McQueenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Carolina Virginia Fashion Exhibitors, Inc. v. GunterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- G. L. Wilson Building Co. v. Thorneburg Hosiery Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Thomas v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carteret County v. United Contractors of Kinston, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Smith v. YOUNG MOVING AND STORAGE, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Faison & Gillespie v. LorantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Howell v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Flynn v. SchamensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.