Flynn v. Schamens
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ELMORE, Judge.
*337 Plaintiff argues on appeal that the trial court erred in failing to confirm an arbitration award upon plaintiff's motion. We agree. The trial court's order is reversed and the case remanded for entry of (1) an order confirming the arbitration award and (2) a judgment in conformity therewith.
I. Background
Karen W. Flynn (plaintiff) sued David Schamens, Piliana Schamens, Invictus Asset Management, LLC, Invictus Capital Growth & Income Fund, LLP, Invictus Income Fund, LLP, and Tradedesk Financial Group, *338 Inc., (collectively, defendants) for alleged misconduct and misrepresentations…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Carteret County v. United Contractors of Kinston, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Carpenter v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- In Re the Arbitration Between the State & Davidson & Jones Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- FCR Greensboro, Inc. v. C & M Investments of High Point, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Se. Eye Ctr. (Pending Matters)North Carolina Business Court · 2020
- Reynolds v. Devotion Fam., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025
- Town of Apex v. RubinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
- Town of Apex v. RubinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021