Legal Opinion

Consolidated Flower Shipments, Inc.,- Bay Area v. Civil Aeronautics Board

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1953No. 13727_1PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Chief Judge.

This is a petition by Consolidated Flower Shipments, Inc. — Bay Area, hereafter Consolidated, to stay the effective date of an order entered February 5, 1953, of the Civil Aeronautics Board, hereafter the Board, requiring Consolidated to cease and desist in ■ certain actions, pending the consideration of Consolidated’s petition for a review by this court of the Board’s order. 1

The petition is opposed as to its merits' by the Board and by Consolidated’s competitor, Airborne Flower and Freight Traffic,. Inc. This court, sua sponte, raised the jurisdictional question whether…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Packard Motor Car Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. PopkinSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Ex Parte Public National Bank of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. McDonald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. The Wilderness Society v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Secretary of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. Truman Outland v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Delta Airlines, Inc., Air Line Pilots Association, International, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
  3. Eldon C. Hart v. John L. McLucas Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, and National Transportation Safety BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  4. Arch Mineral Corporation v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Samuel B. Franklin & Company v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API