Legal Opinion

People v. Whitehurst

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1992No. E009941PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

Defendant was charged with two counts of inflicting corporal punishment on a child resulting in a traumatic condition (Pen. Code, 1 § 273d), the first count involving Natalie P. and the second count Stephen W. After a jury trial, he was convicted of misdemeanor battery (§ 242) on count I and was acquitted on count II. Imposition of sentence was suspended and defendant was placed on three years’ probation.

On appeal he raises three instructional errors: (1) the court erred in failing to instruct sua sponte on a parent’s right to discipline a child; (2) the court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  3. People v. HendersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  4. People v. St. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  5. People v. WadeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. CheckettsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Davis v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
  4. People v. CastilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Nevarez v. GodwinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API