Legal Opinion
People v. Castillo
California Supreme Court
Decided November 13, 1997No. Docket Nos. S056310, B099613PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
16 Cal.4th 1009 (1997)
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
ADAM CASTILLO, Defendant and Appellant. In re ADAM CASTILLO on Habeas Corpus.
Docket Nos. S056310, B099613.
Supreme Court of California.
November 13, 1997.
COUNSEL
Dan Mrotek, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.
Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Carol Wendelin Pollack, Assistant Attorney General, Sanjay T. Kumar, Steven D. Matthews, John R. Gorey, Robert F. Katz and Mitchell Keiter, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
OPINION
CHIN, J.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. SedenoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. Mendoza TelloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- (HC) Foster v. GasteloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019