Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Arizona Real Estate Board

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 20, 1976No. 1 CA-CIV 3030PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Chief Judge.

The issue in this case is whether appellant is engaged in a business which requires compliance with the licensing provisions of the Arizona Real Estate Act, A. R.S. Sec. 32-2101 et seq.

Appellant conducts a business in Tucson, Arizona known as “Rentex of Tucson”. Appellant compiles a catalogue of available rentals and sells the list to prospective tenants for a flat $30 annual fee. He and his employees contact landlords, secure information from them on their rentals and with the landlords’ permission, they list the details of the property in their Rentex cat-alogue.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United Interchange, Inc. v. SpellacySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  2. Bonasera v. RoffeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  3. Arizona Real Estate Department v. Arizona Land Title & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Dyer v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Real Estate Commission v. PharesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United Home Rentals, Inc., Michael A. Livingston and W. Eugene Bushman v. Texas Real Estate Commission and the State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  2. Mousa v. SabaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Pruitt v. PavelinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. Diversified General Corp. v. White Barn Golf Course, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Brill v. STATE REAL ESTATE DIVISION, ETC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API