Legal Opinion

Diversified General Corp. v. White Barn Golf Course, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1978No. 15462PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiff, a Utah corporation, initiated this action to recover a commission, claimed pursuant to a written agreement denominated by the parties a “Finders Agreement.” After completing discovery defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground plaintiff was performing the serv*849ices of a real estate broker as specified in § 61-2-2, U.C.A., 1953, was unlicensed under chapter 2, Title 21, and was, therefore, precluded from maintaining such an action under § 61-2~18(a), U.C.A., 1953. The trial court granted defendant summary judgment on the aforecited ground and plaintiff…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Corson v. KeaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Baird v. KrancerNew York Supreme Court · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Andalex Resources, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
  2. BLT Investment Co. v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Consolidated Realty Group v. Sizzling Platter, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  4. Sachs v. LesserUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. C.J. Realty, Inc. v. WilleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API