Diversified General Corp. v. White Barn Golf Course, Inc.
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Plaintiff, a Utah corporation, initiated this action to recover a commission, claimed pursuant to a written agreement denominated by the parties a “Finders Agreement.” After completing discovery defendant moved for summary judgment on the ground plaintiff was performing the serv*849ices of a real estate broker as specified in § 61-2-2, U.C.A., 1953, was unlicensed under chapter 2, Title 21, and was, therefore, precluded from maintaining such an action under § 61-2~18(a), U.C.A., 1953. The trial court granted defendant summary judgment on the aforecited ground and plaintiff…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Tyrone v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Freeman v. JerginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Shaffer v. BeinhornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Corson v. KeaneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Baird v. KrancerNew York Supreme Court · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Andalex Resources, Inc. v. MyersCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1994
- BLT Investment Co. v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1978
- Consolidated Realty Group v. Sizzling Platter, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1996
- Sachs v. LesserUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- C.J. Realty, Inc. v. WilleyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.