Legal Opinion
Pruitt v. Pavelin
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 19, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 6017PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
This appeal arises out of the actions of a real estate salesperson who defrauded the seller of a restaurant by forging certain signatures on a sales contract and security documents. It presents a number of evi-dentiary and legal issues that we will discuss separately after we set forth the facts. The trial court found against the salesperson, Carole Pavelin, in the amount of $158,698.33 compensatory damages and $100,000 punitive damages. It found *198against Pavelin’s employer, C & A Realty, on a theory of respondeat superior for Pavelin’s fraudulent and willful…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ponticas v. K.M.S. InvestmentsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Williams v. Feather Sound, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Carrel v. LuxArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Vaughn C. Payne and Edith Pruitt Payne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1957
- McFarlin v. HallArizona Supreme Court · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Schoff v. Combined Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
- Smith v. American Express Travel Related Services Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Warner v. Southwest Desert Images, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Quinonez on Behalf of Quinonez v. AndersenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.