Legal Opinion

Buckley v. Airshield Corp.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided December 1, 1995No. Civ. A. AW 95-1481PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAMS, District Judge.

Frank T. Buckley (“Dr. Buckley”) instituted suit against Defendants Airshield Corporation (“Airshield”), Fibertec Corporation, Werner Enterprises, Inc. and Washington Freightliner, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”). Dr. Buckley alleges patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 100 et seq. and breach of license agreement. The Defendants deny infringement and urge that Dr. Buckley’s patent is invalid, void and unenforceable.

Currently pending before the Court are Dr. Buckley’s motion to disqualify Mark P. Stone as Defendants’ counsel and his motion to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Bull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Reiter v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. T. C. Theatre Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  4. San Diego Navy Federal Credit Union v. Cumis Insurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. James J. Kevlik v. David B. Goldstein, Town of DerryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Zachair, Ltd. v. DriggsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1997
  2. Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Plant Genetic Systems, N v. v. Ciba SeedsDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1996
  5. Randolph v. PowerComm Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API