Legal Opinion
State v. Dameron
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 28, 1993No. DC D881992M; CA A60258; SC S37145PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*451VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
The state appeals a Court of Appeals decision that reversed defendant’s conviction for criminal trespass in the second degree. ORS 164.245. The dispositive issue is whether defendant remained unlawfully on the premises. The Court of Appeals held that defendant established at trial that he was engaged in a constitutionally protected activity and, therefore, the trial court erred in ruling that the order for defendant to leave the premises was lawful. State v. Dameron, 101 Or App 237, 238, 789 P2d 707 (1990). Because defendant was convicted at trial, we view the evidence in the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Robins v. Pruneyard Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Riley Hill General Contractor, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. HarrisOregon Supreme Court · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Stranahan v. Fred Meyer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Fred Meyer, Inc. v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- State v. RiddellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Safeway, Inc. v. Jane Does 1 through 50Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.