Legal Opinion
Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Casey
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 10, 1995No. 92-35067PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge BRUNETTI; Concurrence by Judge REINHARDT.
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Appellant Fred Meyer, Inc. (“Fred Meyer”) brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against appellee defendants. Fred Meyer is a Dela*1413ware corporation which operates approximately forty freestanding, large retail stores in Oregon. The defendants are organizers and proponents of two initiative petitions. The district court dismissed the action for failure to state a claim, because it found that Fred Meyer failed to show that defendants were acting under color of state law. This appeal followed. We review the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lugar v. Edmondson Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rendell-Baker v. KohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- PruneYard Shopping Center v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Children of the Rosary v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Jensen v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jensen v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Mizkun v. BlanasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7970, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 13,656 Fred Meyer, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. William Casey Herb L. Gray Ken Benjamin Mike Wiley Lon Mabon Phillip Z. Ramsdell No Special Rights Committee Oregon Citizens Alliance John Does, 1 Through 50 Jane Does, 1 Through 50Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.