Legal Opinion

Rose v. City of Coalinga

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1987No. F006329PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEST, Acting P. J.

Ruben J. Rose and his wife, Pauline V. Rose (appellants) appeal from a summary judgment entered in favor of the City of Coalinga (City) in this action for inverse condemnation filed as a result of the destruction of appellants’ building by the City following the Coalinga earthquake which occurred on May 2, 1983.

The central issues are: (1) May an action in inverse condemnation be maintained, or is appellants’ sole remedy in an action in tort? (2) If an action in inverse condemnation can be maintained, are there conflicting inferences that may be drawn by a trier of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Sinaloa Lake Owners Ass'n v. City of Simi ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Sinaloa Lake Owners Association v. City of Simi Valley, James Doody, Defendants-Cross-Defendants/appellees. v. Donald G. Tudor Jennie P. Tudor, Third-Party-Defendants/appellees, County of Ventura, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff/cross-ClaimantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  5. Virgil Barham v. Southern California Edison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API