Legal Opinion

Flury v. Central Publishing House of Reformed Church in the United States

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1928No. 20535PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The defendant filed in this court a motion to dismiss this canse for the reason, as it claims, that there is in fact and law no conflict between the judgment rendered by the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county herein and the judgment rendered by the Court of Appeals of Lake county in the case of Lautermilch v. Painesville Utopia Theater Co., and argues that, notwithstanding the fact that the Court of Appeals of Cuyahoga county found such conflict to exist, this court nevertheless has jurisdiction to review such finding, and that if it finds itself not in accord with the finding of the Court…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Sylvania Home Telephone Co. v. RichardsOhio Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Posin v. A. B. C. Motor Court Hotel, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Jeswald v. HuttOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Buckeye Union Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1946
  4. State Ex Rel. Elliott Co. v. ConnarOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Logsdon v. Main-Nottingham Investment Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1956

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API