Legal Opinion

Gleason v. Gillihan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The two issues raised on this appeal are as follows:

1. Was the plaintiff negligent as to lookout as a matter of law?

2. Were the damages of $11,000 for plaintiff’s injuries excessive?

Negligence as to Lookout.

The duty of lookout has two aspects. Proper lookout at intersections requires a duty of observation and a corollary requirement of making an accurate estimate of the approaching vehicle’s distance and speed. That is, the entering driver has a duty not only to look, but also to exercise reasonable judgment in calculating on the time and opportunity for entering. This dual aspect of the duty…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Boodry v. ByrneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Moritz v. Allied American Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Kablitz v. HoeftWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Spleas v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cords v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Liles v. Employers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. Gustin v. JohannesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Grassl v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Newberger v. PokrassWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API