Gleason v. Gillihan
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
The two issues raised on this appeal are as follows:
1. Was the plaintiff negligent as to lookout as a matter of law?
2. Were the damages of $11,000 for plaintiff’s injuries excessive?
Negligence as to Lookout.
The duty of lookout has two aspects. Proper lookout at intersections requires a duty of observation and a corollary requirement of making an accurate estimate of the approaching vehicle’s distance and speed. That is, the entering driver has a duty not only to look, but also to exercise reasonable judgment in calculating on the time and opportunity for entering. This dual aspect of the duty…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Powers v. Allstate InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Boodry v. ByrneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Moritz v. Allied American Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Kablitz v. HoeftWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Spleas v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cords v. AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Liles v. Employers Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Gustin v. JohannesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Grassl v. NelsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Newberger v. PokrassWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.