Kablitz v. Hoeft

Four issues are raised on this appeal:

1. Did the court err in allowing an orthopedic surgeon engaged by the defendant insurance company to be called as an adverse witness by the plaintiff ?

2. Did the court err in failing, as requested by the defendants, to instruct the jury that no damages could be awarded for plaintiff’s osteomyelitis ?

3. Were the damages awarded to plaintiff supported by the evidence ?

4. Should a new trial be granted in the interest of justice?

Calling Defendants’ Doctor Adversely.

At the request of defendants’ counsel, Dr. Alfred Kritter, an orthopedic surgeon, examined…