Clifford v. Allman
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Alameda. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
This is an action for seduction, commenced in San Francisco December 15, 1885, in which the plaintiff, a minor sixteen years of age, sues by her guardian, Bridget Drysdale, who is her mother.
The summons was served on the defendant March 12, *5301886. On March 29, 1886, pending a demurrer to the complaint, and before answering, the defendant duly served notice on plaintiff’s attorney that he would take the deposition of the plaintiff, on behalf of the defendant, before a notary in the city of Oakland, on the fifth day of April, 1886, and on March 30th the notary issued a subpoena…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Estate of MedburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
3Cited by3 opinions
- Malola Pool v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1891
- Smith v. LightstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Dabney v. WilhelmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923