Malola Pool v. Southern Pacific Co.
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the district court of the first district and from an order refusing a new trial. The opinion states the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, J.:
This action was brought by the plaintiff, as adminis-*304tratrix of the estate of Joseph S. Pool, deceased, to recover damage for the alleged negligent killing of Joseph S. Pool while repairing a car in defendant's yard at Ogden, Utah, September 12, 1888. The action was tried with a jury in the first district court at Ogden, April 4, 1890, and a verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff for the sum of $10,000. This defendant assigns as error: (1) Contributory negligence on the part of the deceased, Joseph S. Pool; (2) that Switchman Kilpatrick was a fellow-servant of deceased, and his…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Detroit & Milwaukee Railroad v. Van SteinburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Kane v. Northern Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Southern Pacific Co. v. PoolSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Jones v. CarvellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
- In RE BEHM'S ESTATE. BEHM v. GeeUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Pool v. Southern Pacific Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899
- Evans v. Oregon Short Line RailroadUtah Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.