Legal Opinion

Whelpley v. Nash

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1881PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Tan. Burén. AssuMPsrr. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

Nash, having recovered before a justice of the peace, sued the judgment over before another justice who-gave judgment in his favor, and Whelpley took the cause by cerbiora/ri to the circuit court, where the determination made by the justice was affirmed. Whelpley brought error.

Complaint is made that the declaration was too general. We are inclined to think it was sufficient, but, admitting that, it lacked legal certainty, the objection is unwarranted. The defendant was present and pleaded to the merits without suggesting any dissatisfaction with the declaration, and, as. we are satisfied it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Saunders v. Tioga Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carmer v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Mitts v. HarveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Busch v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Perry v. LinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API