Mitts v. Harvey
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to St. Clair; Vance, J. Replevin by George Mitts against Frank Harvey. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
This suit was commenced in justice’s court, heard on certiorari in the circuit court, and is brought here by the plaintiff by writ of error.
*355The entry upon the docket of the justice’s court shows that, upon the return day of the writ of replevin, the parties were present in court. It then recites:
“Defendant, Frank Harvey, files an affidavit with the court asking for an adjournment until the 23d day of January, A. D. 1899. Court adjourned until the 23d day of January, A. D. 1899, at nine o’clock in the forenoon.”
Defendant did not appear afterwards, and a judgment was taken against him.
After the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mudge v. YaplesMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Waldron v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Post v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Noyes v. HillierMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Wedel v. GreenMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore v. FrederickMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Smith v. KistlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- Loder v. ReedMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- Priest v. American InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1912