Busch v. Wilcox
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Assumpsit by William C. Busch against George A. Wilcox and others on a supersedeas bond. (See 82 Mich. 815, 336; 94 Mich. 223.) From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
Action on the supersedeas bond given on the appeal of the case of Busch v. Wilcox, which is reported in 82 Mich. 315. That action was based upon an alleged fraudulent representation concerning the subject-matter of a logging contract, and in the action plaintiff recovered a verdict of $5,000, which was, on appeal to this court, affirmed. The defendants in this action on the bond undertook to set off, against the claim of the plaintiff, a demand due defendant Wilcox arising out of the same contract, and consisting of a claim for overpayment made by Wilcox to Busch, while he (Busch) was engaged…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Palmer v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Busch v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Michels v. OlmsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hill v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- J. W. Wells Lumber Co. v. Menominee River Boom Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Long v. LockmanDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1905