Legal Opinion

Carmer v. Hubbard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1900PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Genesee; Wisner, J. Case by Lovina Carmer against Charles L. Hubbard, under 2 Comp. Laws 1897, § 5398, for selling intoxicating liquor to plaintiff’s minor son. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This action was commenced in the court of á justice of the peace. The declaration was oral, and was entered in the docket under the statute which requires the docket to show the substance of the pleadings. The entry was as follows:

“The plaintiff declared orally in a plea of trespass on the case for the illegal sale of intoxicating liquor, or furnishing of same, to a minor, and asks damages one hundred dollars or under; to which declaration the defendant pleaded the general issue.”

A judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and defendant appealed. In the circuit a motion was made at the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daniels v. CleggMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Hurtford v. HolmesMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Chicago & Northeastern Railroad v. SturgisMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Wilcox v. Toledo & Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Howser v. MelcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Michigan Realty & Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Board of Education v. Van DerveenMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hunter v. Township of DwightMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  4. McGinnis v. McCarnMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Millspaugh v. SchultzMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API