Legal Opinion

Steenmeyer Corp. v. Mortenson-Neal

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1987No. S-1410PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

OPINION

This appeal arises out of an underlying breach of contract action between Mortenson-Neal and NGC Investment and Development, Inc. [NGC] In Crook v. Mortenson-Neal, 727 P.2d 297 (Alaska 1986), we affirmed a $61,149.49 judgment for Mor-tenson-Neal. After the trial court’s ruling in favor of Mortenson-Neal in that action, NGC did not file a supersedeas bond to stay execution of judgment pending appeal. Mortenson-Neal, therefore, sought to execute its judgment. Mortenson-Neal served Steenmeyer Corporation, a debtor of NGC, and the appellant in this action, with a writ of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Crook v. Mortenson-NealAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Anchorage Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Anchorage Westward HotelAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Luedtke v. Nabors Alaska Drilling, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Ware v. WareAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Kleven v. Yukon-Koyukuk School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Patrick v. Lynden Transport, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Patch v. PatchAlaska Supreme Court · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API