Legal Opinion

Employers Mutual Liability Insurance v. Brower

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFmtz, J.

The appellants, Brower and the Standard Accident Insurance Company, contend that they are not liable for Tollefson’s causal negligence because he was operating his own truck as an independent contractor, and that the court erred in ruling, on motions after verdict, that Tollef son was acting as an employee of Brower. The existence of that relationship had to be established by the plaintiffs to entitle them to recover from Brower and his insurance carrier for Tollef-*488son’s negligence. The following facts were established by undisputed evidence: At the time of the accident, on July 19, 1932,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hills Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Kassela v. HosethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Kolman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Medford Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nepstad v. LambertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  2. Eric Brant v. Schneider National Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2022
  3. Reichert v. Rex Accessories Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Sawin v. NeaseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. Thurn v. La Crosse Liquor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API