Legal Opinion
Sawin v. Nease
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 12, 1939No. 28753PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.
The plaintiff sustained personal injuries from collision with a truck being driven by M. D. Sawin, who he contended was the servant of Sears Roebuck & Company in driving the truck, and both of whom he sued. He recovered a verdict and judgment against both, and they separately appeal. We consider first the contention of Sears Roebuck & Company, hereinafter called Sears.
The accident occurred on a highway between the towns of Temple and Sterling, Okla. Sawin was transporting merchandise between those towns for Sears. The only evidence on the relationship between Sears and Sawin, that is whether…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ross v. St. Louis Dairy Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
- Fairmont Creamery Co. v. CarstenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Barnsdall Refining Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Ellis & Lewis, Inc. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Oklahoma Publishing Co. v. GreenleeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wilson v. MuckalaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Barfield v. BarfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Mistletoe Express Service, Inc. v. CulpSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Keith v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
- Continental Oil Company v. EliasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.