Legal Opinion

Stovall v. Poole

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 1, 1964No. 4260PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

■ This is an appeal from a summary judgment that plaintiff take nothing. Plaintiff Stovall sued defendants Poole, et al, alleging that Poole owned certain oil lands and interests in Brazoria County; that a well had been commenced on such properties but had shut down at 4300 feet due to lack of finances; that defendant Poole orally contracted with plaintiff that if plaintiff would find someone to complete the well as a producer of oil and gas, for 60% of the working interest in the well, that defendant would pay plaintiff a “sum equal to the value of V32 of the oil and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaines v. HammanTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Fitz-Gerald v. HullTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Sheffield v. HoggTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Omohundro v. MatthewsTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Sorrells v. CoffieldTexas Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. James v. Nico Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  2. Hydrocarbon Horizons, Inc. v. Pecos Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. James v. Nico Energy Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  4. Ward v. CrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. Berryhill v. Marshall Exploration, Inc.District Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API