Legal Opinion

Hounihan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. of Bloomington, Illinois

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1969No. 8780PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Presiding Judge.

This is an action on the collision coverage provisions of an automobile insurance policy. Trial to a jury has resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $823.80, and the defendant has appealed. There is no dispute that the plaintiff’s vehicle was damaged and that it was covered by the defendant’s policy and that the defendant is liable under the policy. As the defendant puts the question in its brief, “[t]he only dispute and the only issue involved is the amount of damages recoverable under the terms of the * * * policy.”

The relevant section…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McAnarney v. Newark Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Williamson v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Jack L. Baker Companies v. Pasley Manufacturing & Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Brunner v. Stix, Baer & Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  5. Marler v. PinkstonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Tull v. Housing Auth. of City of ColumbiaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Beis v. DiasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Myers v. American Indemnity CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. McAuliffe v. VonderaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Bargeon v. Perishable Distributing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1971

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API