Legal Opinion

Tull v. Housing Auth. of City of Columbia

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 1985No. 36237PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOWENSTEIN, Judge.

The plaintiff-respondents (hereafter referred to as owners) comprised a partnership which leased a 26 acre tract of land and 150 mobile homes to the defendant-appellant Columbia Housing Authority (CHA) for a low-income housing project in Columbia, Missouri. The lease, which ran from 1969 to 1979, provided that CHA was responsible for any damage done to the trailers by the sub-tenants beyond normal wear and tear, which was defined as

“the natural wearing process of the physical parts or components of a mobile home unit and the premises when in use by the occupants, but not to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. DeArmon v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Groves v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  4. Kirst v. Clarkson Construction CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Casada v. Hamby Excavating Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Business Men's Assurance Co. of America v. GrahamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Wooten v. DeMeanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. American National Insurance Co. v. Noble Communications Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Sharaga v. Auto Owners Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Sheridan v. Sunset Pools of St. Louis, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API