Legal Opinion

State v. Kenyon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 2009No. 81374-4PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

¶1 This case requires examination of the speedy trial rule, Superior Court Criminal Rule (CrR) 3.3.1

¶2 After many continuances, the trial court continued James Ryan Kenyon’s trial for seven counts of first degree unlawful possession of a firearm past the speedy trial date *132due to the unavailability of a judge to preside over his trial. Kenyon moved to dismiss the case pursuant to CrR 3.3, but the trial court denied the motion, ruling the time period was excluded reasoning the unavailability of a judge is an unavoidable circumstance, unlike court congestion. Kenyon was convicted. The Court of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. StrikerWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. MacKWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. DowningWashington Supreme Court · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. OllivierWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. RafayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  3. State v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. State Of Washington, Res/cross-app. v. George Donald Hatt, Jr., App/cross-res.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API