State v. Saunders
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 Christopher Saunders appeals his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, arguing in his statement of additional grounds for review (SAG)1 that the trial court violated his speedy trial rights and that other facts require reversal.2 Because the trial court violated Saunders’s speedy trial rights, we reverse the trial court and remand for entry of an order dismissing the charges against Saunders under CrR 3.3(h).
Van Deren, C.J.
FACTS
¶2 Saunders is a sex offender required to register with the Pierce County Sheriff. He failed to update his registra*212tion as a transient sex offender.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. TerrovonaWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. OllivierWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. SaundersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State Of Washington v. Mary T. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
- State Of Washington v. Arvell L. KindellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- State Of Washington v. Daryl H. RhodesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.