Legal Opinion

Heieck and Moran v. City of Modesto

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1966No. S. F. 22196PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurke, J.

The second and third causes of action of the complaint herein seek recovery from defendant City of Modesto of damages to plaintiff’s property caused by fire. The trial court sustained the city’s general demurrer without leave to amend, and plaintiff appeals from the ensuing judgment dismissing the action as against the city. We have concluded that under prevailing rules of governmental immunity the city incurred no liability for plaintiff’s alleged damages, and that the judgment should be affirmed.

In the second cause of action plaintiff alleges that on May 4, 1962, the fire department of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Muskopf v. Corning Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Corning Hospital District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Morgan v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Shakespeare v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Whitcombe v. County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Connelly v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. Quigley v. Garden Valley Fire Protection Dist.California Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Sava v. FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Cochran v. Herzog Engraving Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API